Official Grindstaff Chronicles Blog

The Chronicles are intended to share the thoughts and lifestyle of people who work hard, like to relax and enjoy life, and are often dismayed by news, politics, and the events of the day that defy common sense. Most of these blog entries will be duplicates of the newsletters on our site, but occasionally there may be additional material written that may not appear on the Grindstaff Chronicles web site.

Sunday, March 26, 2006

Republican Domain Re-direction Looks Stupid, Petty

I just got a message that someone had posted on a forum:

 

This fall's US Senate campaign in the state of Tennessee will likely be between Republican Ed Bryant and Democrat Harold Ford Jr. Both are currently in the US House of Representatives.

I just read that Bryant's campaign registered the domain name www.FordforSenate.com. If you type that in you go to the Bryant campaign web site.

If you're so inclined to complain, here's Bryant's contact info:

Ed Bryant for Senate
5214 Maryland Way Suite 304
Brentwood, TN 37027
Phone: 615-373-2327
Fax: 615-373-9851
Email: info@edbryantforsenate.com

 

Leave it to a politician to make themselves look stupid. Do they think that someone looking for Ford will then be interested in Bryant? Do they think this will sway voters? I think the petty meanness of this action WILL help to sway voters, but not as intended.

(hris

Saturday, March 25, 2006

Doyenne of White House News Correspondents, With Cojones!

Summary of Grindstaff Chronicles for March 24th, 2006

The important question the country needs Bush to answer is why he had decided to invade Iraq even before moving into the White House. A valiant reporter asked that very question of Bush on Tuesday’s White House press briefing.

When Helen Thomas showed the courage her colleagues lacked in spades and asked Bush this question, he turned into a spitting viper in an instant, and needless to say, did not answer.

Helen Thomas needs us all to hound this pathetic White House with her question, until it’s answered. We shouldn’t let the media fail to keep her question in the forefront. We deserve answers, even if they have to be obtained by harassment, censure, or impeachment.

Keywords

Helen Thomas, White House press corps, Absolut vodka, Rose’s Lime Juice, Downing Street Memos, PBS’ News Hour, The New York Times, Schramsberg Blanc de Noirs, La Ina Sherry, Viking grills, Volnay, Loire Valley Saumur-Champigny, censure, impeachment

©Copyright 2006 Grindstaff Chronicles. All Rights Reserved.
================================================
Reprinted from The Grindstaff Chronicles Newsletter which is
published in the USA by farmers, ranchers, and neighbors.

It is intended to share the thoughts and lifestyle of people
who work hard, like to relax and enjoy life, and are often
dismayed by news, politics, and the events of the day
that defy common sense.
http://www.GrindstaffChronicles.com
================================================
Mesothelioma Search

Thursday, March 23, 2006

70-Year-Old Awarded $659,000 in St. Paul Defamation Suit

Jury Awards 70-Year-Old Tuan Pham $659,000 in Defamation Suit Closely Watched Nationally; Former South Vietnamese War Prisoner and St. Paul Community Leader Lost His Business and Honor over Baseless Charges

ST. PAUL, Minn.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--March 23, 2006--A former South Vietnamese soldier who was imprisoned for more than two years after the Vietnam War (primarily for supporting the Catholic Church) and who was later appointed by President George W. Bush to St. Paul's Vietnamese Educational Foundation (VEF), won a $659,000 defamation case against seven defendants whom the jury unanimously agreed ruined his business and his reputation. Tuan J. Pham, 70 years-old, his wife Mai Vu and their University Avenue grocery, Capital Market, won the verdict Wednesday, March 22, 2006, in a rancorous controversy that divided the Twin Cities Vietnamese community and was hotly debated nationally on Vietnamese radio programs.

According to the Plaintiff's Statement of the Case's Claims and Defenses in Ramsey County Second Judicial District Court, the lawsuit arose from events that were triggered by a visit to St. Paul by a Catholic Bishop from Vietnam on December 17, 2003. During his visit to Minnesota, the Bishop was escorted by Pham, a devout Catholic, who served as the Bishop's driver as he visited various members of the Catholic and Vietnamese communities in St. Paul.

Falsehoods spread over South Vietnam Flag incident with visiting Vietnam Catholic Bishop

En route to a meeting of Vietnamese community members at the Vietnam Center in St. Paul, the Bishop noted the presence of the flag of the former Republic of Vietnam flag flying over the center. The Bishop told Pham that he wanted to be taken to a private residence because he was under orders from the Catholic Church to avoid political situations during his visit to the United States that could lead to trouble for the Catholic Church with the Communist government in Vietnam. Pham entered the Vietnam Center and informed the Executive Director of the Bishop's concern about the flag. A decision was made to lower the flag momentarily for the Bishop's visit. After the meeting, the flag was again momentarily lowered while the Bishop exited the building and raised it again after his departure.

Defendants and others begin labeling South Vietnamese patriot a Communist

Subsequently a number of the defendants in this matter learned of the fact that the flag had been lowered to permit the Bishop to enter the Vietnam Center. Beginning in December 2003, a number of people in the Vietnamese community raised concerns about the Republic flag being lowered for the Bishop and called for the removal of the leadership of the organization that controls the Vietnam Center. They also claimed "moral turpitude" on the part of Pham and called for his removal from the Vietnamese Educational Foundation. Defendants, including Dean Do, who had at one time married one of Pham's daughters and used the marriage and the daughter's mental illness, allegedly to extort money from Pham and Capital Market, began labeling Pham a communist and mounted a slanderous personal campaign against him.

"I feel relieved this matter is resolved after two years of suffering for me and my family. As an American, I have always believed in the laws of this country, and I had faith that the court would protect our rights," says Pham. "It is wrong to hurt people or ruin their business with false claims. My family has suffered severely because of these baseless attacks. We brought this case for our children and their children to help the Vietnamese community work within the American system. Our young people must know that you must respect other's right and that you can fight for your dignity and honor and the law will back you." Pham says if he collects the awarded damages he hopes to build two Buddhist schools and one Catholic school in his native land.

Immigrant communities put on notice

"Tuan Pham's landmark case will change the way the Vietnamese and other immigrant communities operate as they gain full access an acceptance in the general community. The public debate must be free and robust, however, this verdict sends the message that slander and character assassination will not be tolerated under our laws," says Pham's attorney Darrin Rosha of Scherzo and Trio Legal Advisors, PLLC in St. Paul. "Mr. Pham, his family, and his business clearly suffered at the hands of the defendants in this case. They not only spread false and malicious statements about him, including false claims of criminal acts, but also forced a community boycott of his grocery business and brought it to ruin. The jury wisely and unanimously upheld his rights as an American citizen to redress those wrongs."

For more information - or to interview Tuan Pham or Darrin Rosha - please contact Martin Keller at Media Savant Communications Co., 612-729-8585 or mkeller@mediasavant.com

Contacts
Media Savant Communications Co.
Martin Keller, 612-729-8585
mkeller@mediasavantcom.com

Friday, March 17, 2006

Vacuous Questions - March 17, 2006

Flip Flopper In Chief, Qué Pasó Nena?
Well, you can't have a much more girlier man than one who can't live without grabbing at women's dress hems and silently screaming: "beat me, flog me, just don't leave me!" Imagine, this Flip, Flip Flopper In Chief is encircled by Dominatrices: His cold as a witch's tit mamma, his dark as Hades and evil as Hitler Condosleezza Rice, his enabler Harriet Miers, and his dumber but butcher'n hell Karen "Polyester Pantsuit but Inane" Hughes, who is dumber than the blind salamanders so famous in her back yard. And this is the Führer 59,054,087 U.S. Sans Brains, Ethics or Patriotism twice "elected" as president? Anyway, tonight some of the gang just had some little questions about the grand plans to have Karen Hughes solve the questions of the Middle East.
 
First, Karen, Tell Us Again, Where is the Middle East?
Oh, is that the place where women are dying to wear pants like yours and drive cars? Is that their dying passion, their only dream?

With all of the events of the recent 15 days, have you been hiding your derrière where Cheney hides his when things beyond your comprehension are occurring? If not, then how come you haven't been out there in the forefront explaining "the west" to the Middle East? Oh goodness, they didn't muzzle you, did they? Heck, gal, we're paying your salary, so you are accountable to us, not only the guy whose butt you spank.
 
A Day's Labor For a Day's Pay
Hey, Karen, are you giving us our money's worth? Big title you got there gal, are we gettin' what George thinks your worth?
 
Hey gal, explain to the U.S., just what is the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership, or the Barcelona Process? Whatcha doin' to make it work? Or, do you even know what it is and when it was implemented? There's no time to play with your kid in Austin right now gal, you gotta produce, sweetie pie.
 
Well, gal, you're not as overtly repulsive or as well-recognized as the Big Mamma of Torture as 'Sleezza' Rice is, but you're close. So, if you have any redeeming virtues, explain to your country, in twelve paragraphs or less for each item, since your fellow citizens are going to be requiring it of you, what the follow subjects/headlines concern:
 
1) Israel Assaults West Bank Prison
2) Leaders Sehebaa Farms is Lebanese Territory
3) Iran, India, Pakistan Start Talks on Gas Pipeline
4) Body Counts in Iraq Keep Rising
5) Olmert Declares Ariel Settlement in West Bank Will Remain
6) Russia-Syria Arms Deal Legitimate
7) Abbas Urges EU to Continue Aid to Palestinian Government
8) Finland Pushes Dialogue on Islam
9) UN Report: Syria is Cooperating
10) Democracy May Be a Priority in the EU's Southern Policy
11) On Oil, Bush Deploys Vast Reserves of Ineptitude
12) This Is Why Islamists are Winning
 
So, Suburban-driving soccer-mom, the U.S. is holding you to account. What are the twelve-paragraph answers to these subjects? The country is waiting for your answers; if you can't answer, give up your lucrative paycheck and go back to your dumb, blind salamanders, who all look and act like your prez.
 
Dinner Gong! Sorry Karen
Enough for one night. Let's see if together we can get the Hughes gal to answer these questions to your and our satisfaction. If not, you know the next step to take up the chain of command, but for now, let's eat.
 
Charlotte prepared some Eggplant and Mozzarella on Mille Feuilles. Normally, Charlotte would make her own puff pastry, but ranching concerns forced her to use a source from which we, in a bind, get our already-prepared puff pastry, Taylor's Market, which you can access at www.taylorsmarket.com for overnight delivery of puff pastry on ice. She chose a very nice dry sparkling wine from Gruet in New Mexico. Excellent pairing, and as appetizer, it did prepare us for the dishes that were yet to come.

Marie Christine had once tried Chinese Chicken and Aspargus Soup in Paris, and attempted to replicate the recipe for us. Did she succeed? She's never failed. Her soup was glorious, and paired with an Hidalgo Pastrana Amontillado Sherry, transported us to that land we love to live in, that of the contented gourmet the people at the local feed shop love to laugh at. Food geeks indeed; just 'cause we don't chew tobacco and spit on the floor. Now really.
 
Charlotte and Beatrix put a lot of effort into their beautiful Seafood Terrine, plated with Grilled Artichokes with Lemon Oil Dip. They paired these dishes with a good Chenin Blanc from South Africa. Difficult preparation but simple plating: a wonderful treat for us.
 
Art and Max served us small dollops of Strawberry Mousse to prepare our palates for our next course, the meat course.

The bank of three Viking grills was going on the porch, and Art and Max teamed up to fix us a true delight, their Grilled Texas T-Bone Steaks, with grilled Onion Rings, Bell Peppers and Zucchini, with a side of garlicky mashed potatoes. They paired their masterpiece with an Australian shiraz, the excellent McPherson South-Eastern Australia shiraz.
 
Calming Down
Beatrix made superb Poached Pears with Crème Frâiche, one of our favorite desserts. We had ours with small snifters of Grand Marnier, thanked tonight's "chefs" and returned to the great room to spend some time with the teenagers while we sipped our after-dinner coffee Max prepared for us from his special brews. Then, we put on our jackets and headed for our respective farms and ranches, always aware of different chores still waiting because of the strange, unusual tricks the weather has been playing on us.
 
Summary
The British have officially labeled Dubya a splendiferous inept. We can only imagine what the rest of the world thinks of us, and him, and yet Dubya keeps sending equally superbly inept "envoys" out to win the hearts and minds of the Arab and Muslim worlds. We, and the Arab and Muslims, deserve better than just Bush's derrière kissers. World events are signaling events of dire importance; too much importance for the infamously xenophobic, Texas-centric Karen Hughes, or the always attitude-challenged, snide to the point of grotesqueness Condosleezza.

©Copyright 2006 Grindstaff Chronicles. All Rights Reserved.
================================================
Reprinted from The Grindstaff Chronicles Newsletter which is published in the USA by farmers, ranchers, and neighbors.

It is intended to share the thoughts and lifestyle of people who work hard, like to relax and enjoy life, and are often dismayed by news, politics, and the events of the day that defy common sense.
http://www.GrindstaffChronicles.com
================================================

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Bush Withering

President Bush's Job Approval Ratings Continue to Drop, According to Latest Harris Poll
 
Less than one-third of U.S. adults believe the country is going in the right direction
 
ROCHESTER, N.Y., March 14 /PRNewswire/ -- Although slightly better than the lowest approval ratings measured during his presidency (34% positive, 65% negative in November 2005), President Bush's job approval numbers have again taken a downward slide this month as just over one-third (36%) of U.S. adults rate his job performance as positive and 64 percent rate his performance as negative. In February, 40 percent viewed the president's job performance positively while 58 percent viewed it negatively. Some of this may be linked to the thoughts on the state of the country as 31 percent believe the country is moving in the right direction while 60 percent feel things have pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track. This is directionally down from last month when 32 percent felt the country was moving in the right direction and 59 percent felt things had pretty seriously gotten off on the wrong track.
 
These are some of the results from the latest Harris Poll of 1,001 U.S. adults surveyed by telephone between March 3 and 7, 2006 by Harris Interactive(R).
 
For the first time, The Harris Poll(R) measured the job performance ratings for Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts. The chief justice starts off his tenure on the Court with 41 percent of U.S. adults viewing his job performance positively and 36 percent viewing it negatively. It will be interesting to see if the percentage of adults who say they are "not sure" about this job performance (23%) stays this high as the nomination and subsequent media coverage fades from the public's memory.
 
Administration ratings
 
For the first time since the hunting accident, Vice President Dick Cheney's job approval ratings were measured. Three in 10 U.S. adults view his job performance positively while 67 percent view it negatively. What is interesting is that there is no real change from November, prior to the accident, when 30 percent had a positive view and 65 percent had a negative view.
 
For two other administration officials, the news is mixed. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice still receives the highest performance ratings among all political figures measured in the poll as 51 percent have a positive view of her job performance as compared to 44 percent who have a negative view. While Secretary Rice's positive approval rating remained similar to what was measured in November 2005 (52%), her negative rating increased three percentage points (from 41%). Similarly for Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, his positive rating has remained steady (34% in November to 35% now), while his negative rating has increased slightly (59% in November to 61% now).
 
This month we also asked about Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove. Just over one-quarter (28%) rate the job he is doing positively while over half (55%) rate it negatively. U.S. adults appear more likely to have an opinion about Karl Rove, one way or another, than all four of the members of Congress and the Supreme Court Chief Justice included in this poll, as indicated by the percentage of "not sure's."
 
Congressional ratings
 
Republicans and Democrats in Congress can take some solace in the fact that their numbers have not changed much from November. However since they were not that good in November, this may not necessarily be good news for them. This month, Republicans have a 27 percent positive job approval rating while 68 percent of U.S. adults view their performance as negative. Democrats fair slightly worse with a 24 percent positive job approval rating and a 70 percent negative rating. In November, Republicans were 27 percent positive, 69 percent negative while Democrats were 25 percent positive, 70 percent negative.
 
Much of this negativity toward the two parties in Congress is also seen in the job performance numbers of some of its leaders.
 
  * Republican Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist has a 21 percent positive
    approval rating and a 55 percent negative rating. This is down from
    November when he had a positive rating of 23 percent and a negative
    rating of 52 percent.
  * Things aren't much better for Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry
    Reid as about one in five adults (19%) gives him a positive job approval
    rating while over half (53%) view his job performance negatively. When
    his performance was last measured in August, about one-quarter (24%)
    viewed his job performance positively while 47 percent viewed it
    negatively.
  * In the House, Republican Speaker Dennis Hastert has seen a slight up
    tick in his approval ratings. This month they are at 26 percent
    positive, up from 22 percent in November, while his negative job rating
    is at 49 percent, down from 50 percent.
  * Also measured for the first time was new Republican House Majority
    Leader John Boehner who starts with a job approval of 23 percent
    positive and 50 percent negative.
 
Important issues
 
Again this month, the most important issue for the government to address according to the American public is the war in Iraq, but that number has taken a dip. This month, 21 percent of U.S. adults believe it is the most important issue to address as compared to last month when 27 percent felt this way. Healthcare is next as 16 percent of adults believe the government should address this issue, closely followed by the economy (15%). While fewer adults think the war and healthcare are the most important issues (down 6 percentage points and 4 percentage points, respectively, from last month), more adults think gas and oil prices (up from 2% to 5%) and employment issues (up from 5% to 8%) should be top priorities.
 
TABLE 1
 
CURRENT RATINGS OF PRESIDENT, SENIOR CABINET MEMBERS AND PARTIES IN CONGRESS "How would you rate the job (READ ITEM) are/is doing - excellent, pretty good,
 
                           only fair, or poor?"
 
  Base: All Adults
 
                    Excellent  Pretty  Only   Poor  Not Positive* Negative**
                                Good   Fair         Sure
  Secretary of
   State Condoleezza
   Rice              %   19      32     29     16    5     51        44
  President George
   W. Bush           %    9      27     22     41   ***    36        64
  Secretary of
   Defense Donald
   Rumsfeld          %    8      28     29     31    4     35        61
  Vice President
   Dick Cheney       %    7      23     26     41    3     30        67
  Chief Justice
   John Roberts      %    8      33     29     8    23     41        36
  Deputy White House
   Chief of Staff
   Karl Rove         %    5      23     33     23   17     28        55
  Democrats in
   Congress          %    3      21     43     27    6     24        70
  Republicans in
   Congress          %    3      24     35     33    6     27        68
  Senate Minority
   Leader Harry Reid %    1      17     36     17   28     19        53
  Senate Majority
   Leader Bill Frist %    2      19     38     17   24     21        55
  House Speaker
   Dennis Hastert    %    3      24     36     14   24     26        49
  House Majority
   Leader John
   Boehner           %    2      21     38     11   28     23        50
 
  *Positive = excellent or pretty good.
  **Negative = only fair or poor
  ***Less than 0.5%.
 

                                 TABLE 2
             POSITIVE RATINGS: TRENDS SINCE 9/11/01: SUMMARY
 
  Base: All Adults
 

   POSITIVE RATINGS    Soon
                       After   Feb.  April   Aug.  Dec.  Feb.  April  June
                       9/11    2003   2003   2003  2003  2004  2004   2004
  President George
   W. Bush          %   88      52     70     57     50   51    48    50
  Vice President
   Dick Cheney      %   69      45     55     42     42   41    36    42
  Secretary of
   State Condoleezza
   Rice             %   **      **     **     **     **   **    **    **
  Secretary of
   Defense Donald
   Rumsfeld         %   78      56     71     55     57   50    45    47
 

  POSITIVE RATINGS         Nov.   Feb.  April   June    Aug.  Nov.   Mar.
                           2004   2005   2005   2005   2005   2005   2006
  President George
   W. Bush            %     50     48      44    45      40    34      36
  Vice President
   Dick Cheney        %     48     45      37    38      35    30      30
  Secretary of State
   Condoleezza Rice   %     **     52      54    52      57    52      51
  Secretary of
   Defense Donald
   Rumsfeld           %     47     42      42    42      40     34     35
 
  ** N/A
 
                                 TABLE 3
                   PRESIDENT BUSH'S OVERALL JOB RATING
                          (Not Sure's Excluded)
 
 "How would you rate the overall job President George W. Bush is doing as
         president - excellent, pretty good, only fair, or poor?"
 
  Base: All Adults
 

                           TREND                    Positive*    Negative**
  2006                     March            %           36           64
                           February         %           40           58
                           January          %           43           56
  2005                     November         %           34           65
                           August           %           40           58
                           June             %           45           55
                           April            %           44           56
                           February         %           48           51
  2004                     November         %           50           49
                           October          %           51           49
                           September        %           45           54
                           August           %           48           51
                           June             %           50           49
                           April            %           48           51
                           February         %           51           48
  2003                     December         %           50           49
                           October          %           59           40
                           August           %           57           41
                           June             %           61           36
                           April            %           70           29
                           February         %           52           46
  2002                     December         %           64           35
                           November         %           65           33
                           October          %           64           35
                           September        %           68           30
                           August           %           63           37
                           July             %           62           37
                           June             %           70           28
                           May              %           74           25
                           April            %           75           23
                           March            %           77           22
                           February         %           79           20
                           January          %           79           19
  2001                     December         %           82           17
                           November         %           86           12
                           October          %           88           11
                           August           %           52           43
                           July             %           56           39
                           June             %           50           46
                           May              %           59           35
                           March            %           49           38
                           February         %           56           26
 
  *Positive = excellent or pretty good.
  **Negative = only fair or poor.
 

                                 TABLE 4
                  RATINGS OF VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY
                          (Not Sure's Excluded)
 
"And how would you rate the job Vice President Cheney is doing - excellent,
 

                     pretty good, only fair or poor?"
 
  Base: All Adults
 

                           TREND                    Positive*   Negative**
  2006                     March            %           30           67
  2005                     November         %           30           65
                           August           %           35           60
                           June             %           38           56
                           April            %           37           60
                           February         %           45           52
  2004                     November         %           48           50
                           October          %           47           51
                           September        %           40           54
                           August           %           40           54
                           June             %           42           49
                           April            %           36           52
                           February         %           41           48
  2003                     December         %           42           47
                           October          %           42           44
                           August           %           42           45
                           June             %           49           40
                           April            %           55           36
                           February         %           45           44
  2002                     December         %           50           37
                           November         %           52           39
                           October          %           54           37
                           September        %           52           37
                           August           %           45           43
                           July             %           46           41
                           June             %           55           34
                           May              %           55           33
                           April            %           55           31
                           March            %           59           29
                           February         %           57           31
                           January          %           55           31
  2001                     October          %           69           20
                           July             %           39           52
 
  *Positive = excellent or pretty good.
  **Negative = only fair or poor.
 

                                 TABLE 5
              RATINGS OF SECRETARY OF STATE CONDOLEEZZA RICE
 
(Not Sure's Excluded) "And how would you rate the job Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice is doing -
 

               excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?"
 
  Base: All Adults
 
                           TREND                    Positive*   Negative**
  2006                     March            %           51           44
  2005                     November         %           52           41
                           August           %           57           37
                           June             %           52           41
                           April            %           54           39
                           February         %           52           40
 
  *Positive = excellent or pretty good.
  **Negative = only fair or poor.
 

                                 TABLE 6
             RATINGS OF SECRETARY OF DEFENSE DONALD RUMSFELD
 
(Not Sure's Excluded) "And how would you rate the job Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld is doing
 

              - excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?"
 
  Base: All Adults
 
                           TREND                  Positive*   Negative**
  2006                     March            %           35           61
  2005                     November         %           34           59
                           August           %           40           58
                           June             %           42           53
                           April            %           42           56
                           February         %           42           56
  2004                     November         %           47           50
                           October          %           46           50
                           September        %           43           50
                           August           %           45           49
                           June             %           47           47
                           April            %           45           47
                           February         %           50           43
  2003                     December         %           57           38
                           October          %           47           44
                           August           %           55           36
                           June             %           60           32
                           April            %           71           22
                           February         %           56           35
  2002                     December         %           59           30
                           November         %           59           30
                           October          %           60           30
                           September        %           61           27
                           August           %           60           29
                           July             %           56           33
                           June             %           65           24
                           May              %           67           22
                           April            %           70           18
                           March            %           71           18
                           February         %           70           17
                           January          %           77           16
  2001                     December         %           75           14
                           October          %           78           12
 
  *Positive = excellent or pretty good.
  **Negative = only fair or poor.
 
 
 
                                 TABLE 7
                 RATINGS OF HOUSE SPEAKER DENNIS HASTERT
                          (Not Sure's Excluded)
 "And how would you rate the job House Speaker Dennis Hastert is doing -
               excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?"
 
  Base: All Adults
 
                           TREND                    Positive*   Negative**
  2006                     March            %           26           49
  2005                     November         %           22           50
                           August           %           26           46
                           June             %           28           44
                           April            %           30           50
  2004                     September        %           29           33
                           August           %           29           33
                           June             %           29           32
                           April            %           25           35
                           February         %           26           35
  2003                     December         %           24           30
                           October          %           29           35
                           August           %           29           36
                           June             %           34           31
                           April            %           41           29
                           February         %           33           34
  2002                     December         %           26           33
                           November         %           30           31
                           October          %           30           29
                           September        %           35           29
                           August           %           29           35
                           July             %           28           36
                           June             %           34           31
                           May              %           33           25
                           April            %           32           26
                           March            %           33           25
                           February         %           37           25
                           January          %           40           24
  2001                     October (high)   %           52           16
                           August (low)     %           27           29
  2000                     August (high)    %           29           28
                           July (low)       %           23           31
  1999                     October (low)    %           25           34
                           April (high)     %           36           39
 
  *Positive = excellent or pretty good.
  **Negative = only fair or poor.
 
 
 
                                 TABLE 8
               RATINGS OF SENATE MAJORITY LEADER BILL FRIST
                          (Not Sure's Excluded)
 
"And how would you rate the job Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist is doing -
 

               excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?"
 
  Base: All Adults
 
                           TREND                    Positive*   Negative**
  2006                     March            %           21           55
  2005                     November         %           23           52
                           August           %           28           49
                           June             %           28           47
                           April            %           32           51
  2004                     September        %           27           40
                           August           %           28           38
                           June             %           30           36
                           April            %           26           36
                           February         %           31           36
  2003                     December         %           27           38
                           October          %           29           34
                           August           %           32           35
                           June             %           38           32
                           April            %           39           29
                           February         %           37           30
 
  *Positive = excellent or pretty good.
  **Negative = only fair or poor
 

                                 TABLE 9
               RATINGS OF SENATE MINORITY LEADER HARRY REID
                          (Not Sure's Excluded)
 
"And how would you rate the job Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid is doing -
 

               excellent, pretty good, only fair or poor?"
 
  Base: All Adults
 
                           TREND                     Positive*   Negative**
  2006                     March            %           19           53
  2005                     August           %           24           47
 
 
 
                                 TABLE 10
                    RATINGS OF REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS
 
(Not Sure's Excluded) "And how would you rate the job Republicans in Congress are doing - excellent,
 

                     pretty good, only fair or poor?"
 
  Base: All Adults
 
                           TREND                    Positive*   Negative**
  2006                     March            %           27           68
  2005                     November         %           27           69
                           August           %           32           64
                           June             %           37           58
                           April            %           36           61
  2004                     September        %           38           56
                           August           %           40           54
                           June             %   &n